Effect of Oxyflower® Gel as an Adjunct in Pericoronitis Treatment: A Randomized, Triple-Blind Clinical Trial

Silveira, Esmeralda Maria da and Galvão, Endi Lanza and Magesty, Rafael Alvim and Soares, Kaio Henrique and Martins, Olga Beatriz Lopes and Oliveira, Dhelfeson Willya Douglas de and Flecha, Olga Dumont and Verli, Flaviana Dornela and Gonçalves, Patricia Furtado (2024) Effect of Oxyflower® Gel as an Adjunct in Pericoronitis Treatment: A Randomized, Triple-Blind Clinical Trial. Archives of Current Research International, 24 (4). pp. 45-58. ISSN 2454-7077

[thumbnail of Gonçalves2442024ACRI114552.pdf] Text
Gonçalves2442024ACRI114552.pdf - Published Version

Download (503kB)

Abstract

Methodology: A randomized controlled, triple-blind, longitudinal clinical trial was performed. The sample consisted of 55 participants diagnosed with pericoronitis at the Periodontics and Surgery Clinic of UFVJM. Patients underwent emergency treatment, with local debridement and irrigation with saline solution, followed by topical application of the randomly selected gel: Oxyflower® (OXY, n=19); chlorhexidine gel (CLX, n=17), or placebo (PLC, n=19). In cases of pericoronitis with systemic signs/symptoms, such as fever, malaise, and lymphadenopathy, systemic antibiotic therapy was prescribed one hour before debridement, lasting seven days. Participants received guidance on oral hygiene, and adequacy of the area and were instructed to apply the same gel at home, twice a day for seven days, in addition to being instructed to use analgesics when there was pain. Follow-up was done after 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, 90, and 120 days. After 30 days, the definitive treatment was performed according to the indication: extraction, distal wedge surgery, or follow-up. Participants were followed longitudinally for an additional 90 days, totaling 120 days of follow-up. Pain and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated as primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes: probing depth (PD), bone crest level at the distal of the second molar (BCL), mouth opening (MO), and extent of edema/erythema (EEE) in the pericoronal hood region. Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding Index on Probing (BOP), and lower third molar positioning were also evaluated using panoramic radiography. A comparative analysis was performed between the groups using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. The Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model was used to estimate the differences between groups in pain, QOL, EEE, MO, PI, BOP, PD, and BCL values at each follow-up time. Post-hoc tests of the main effects and interactions were performed using Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Universal Eprints > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2024 06:10
Last Modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:10
URI: http://journal.article2publish.com/id/eprint/3670

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item