Standardization of a CT Protocol for Imaging Patients with Suspected COVID-19—A RACOON Project

Steuwe, Andrea and Kamp, Benedikt and Afat, Saif and Akinina, Alena and Aludin, Schekeb and Bas, Elif Gülsah and Berger, Josephine and Bohrer, Evelyn and Brose, Alexander and Büttner, Susanne Martina and Ehrengut, Constantin and Gerwing, Mirjam and Grosu, Sergio and Gussew, Alexander and Güttler, Felix and Heinrich, Andreas and Jiraskova, Petra and Kloth, Christopher and Kottlors, Jonathan and Kuennemann, Marc-David and Liska, Christian and Lubina, Nora and Manzke, Mathias and Meinel, Felix G. and Meyer, Hans-Jonas and Mittermeier, Andreas and Persigehl, Thorsten and Schmill, Lars-Patrick and Steinhardt, Manuel and Antoch, Gerald and Valentin, Birte (2024) Standardization of a CT Protocol for Imaging Patients with Suspected COVID-19—A RACOON Project. Bioengineering, 11 (3). p. 207. ISSN 2306-5354

[thumbnail of bioengineering-11-00207.pdf] Text
bioengineering-11-00207.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

CT protocols that diagnose COVID-19 vary in regard to the associated radiation exposure and the desired image quality (IQ). This study aims to evaluate CT protocols of hospitals participating in the RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network) project, consolidating CT protocols to provide recommendations and strategies for future pandemics. In this retrospective study, CT acquisitions of COVID-19 patients scanned between March 2020 and October 2020 (RACOON phase 1) were included, and all non-contrast protocols were evaluated. For this purpose, CT protocol parameters, IQ ratings, radiation exposure (CTDIvol), and central patient diameters were sampled. Eventually, the data from 14 sites and 534 CT acquisitions were analyzed. IQ was rated good for 81% of the evaluated examinations. Motion, beam-hardening artefacts, or image noise were reasons for a suboptimal IQ. The tube potential ranged between 80 and 140 kVp, with the majority between 100 and 120 kVp. CTDIvol was 3.7 ± 3.4 mGy. Most healthcare facilities included did not have a specific non-contrast CT protocol. Furthermore, CT protocols for chest imaging varied in their settings and radiation exposure. In future, it will be necessary to make recommendations regarding the required IQ and protocol parameters for the majority of CT scanners to enable comparable IQ as well as radiation exposure for different sites but identical diagnostic questions.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Universal Eprints > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2024 04:11
Last Modified: 23 Feb 2024 04:11
URI: http://journal.article2publish.com/id/eprint/3641

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item